← TrialMatch
HomeTrials

Comparative Experimental Study Between Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine Regarding Efficacy in T

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in third molar removal surgery under general anesthesia in healthy volunteers. The main question aims to determine whether there is any difference in vital signs, hemostasis and postoperative pain between ropivacaine and bupivacai

Condition(s)Third Molars Extraction
StatusRecruiting
PhaseEARLY_Phase 1
Study typeInterventional
SummaryThe goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in third molar removal surgery under general anesthesia in healthy volunteers. The main question aims to determine whether there is any difference in vital signs, hemostasis and postoperative pain between ropivacaine and bupivacaine in patients undergoing third molars extraction under general anesthesia. Researchers will compare bupivacaine and ropivacaine in a split-mouth study to determine if one drug is more effective in third molar extraction surgery under general anesthesia (better hemostasis, less postoperative pain, and fewer changes in vital signs). Participants will undergo a single surgical procedure and complete the Visual Analog Scale to record postoperative pain
Who can participateInclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18 to 60 * Patients ASA Physical Status Classification I and II * Patients with impacted or semi-impacted lower third molars with similar positioning on both sides according to the Pell and Gregory classification Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who can have surgery under local anesthesia * Patients where more procedures are required in the same surgical session
Ages18 Years to 60 Years
SexAll
Accepts healthy volunteersYes
Lead sponsorHenrique Tedesco
LocationsPorto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Start date2025-07-01
NCT IDNCT07108465
Official listinghttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07108465

🔍 Search all trials →