The Cost-effectiveness of Hysterosalpingography Versus Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography Dur
Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography are two methods to assess tubal patency during fertility work-up. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG compared to tubal flushing during HyFoSy in women undergoing fertility work-up. The hypo
| Condition(s) | Infertility |
|---|---|
| Status | Recruiting |
| Phase | NA |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Summary | Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography are two methods to assess tubal patency during fertility work-up. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG compared to tubal flushing during HyFoSy in women undergoing fertility work-up. The hypothesis is that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG leads to more live births than tubal flushing during HyFoSy. |
| Who can participate | Inclusion Criteria: * Infertile women or women with oligo-or anovulation * Indication for tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up * Sufficient understanding of the Dutch or English language * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Severe male factor with a total motile sperm count \<3x106ml (pre-washed) * Known contrast (iodine) allergy * Women who have had a gynecologic procedure within the last 30 days * Women with known or suspected reproductive tract neoplasia |
| Ages | 18 Years to 42 Years |
| Sex | Female |
| Lead sponsor | Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc |
| Locations | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Start date | 2023-09-22 |
| NCT ID | NCT05882188 |
| Official listing | https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05882188 |